# FILE NAME: 00000254.soc
# TITLE: Is there value in allowing privately-owned media? [419fee69f37f75b08164d23dd7a442cb]
# DESCRIPTION: 
# DATA TYPE: soc
# MODIFICATION TYPE: original
# RELATES TO: 
# RELATED FILES: 
# PUBLICATION DATE: 2025-10-12
# MODIFICATION DATE: 2025-10-12
# NUMBER ALTERNATIVES: 4
# NUMBER VOTERS: 5
# NUMBER UNIQUE ORDERS: 5
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 1: Statement 1 - In general, the existence of privately owned media is a necessary condition for the freedom of the press, and a healthy democracy.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 2: Statement 2 - There should be privately-owned media, as it encourages freedom of speech and different ways of looking at things. It is also important for the government to not be the sole holder of the information and control the narrative. However, privately-owned media outlets should not be allowed to publish information that is harmful or misleading to the public. There should be an independent media watchdog to police the media and make sure it is not harmful or misleading to the public.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 3: Statement 3 - In conclusion, yes, there is value in allowing privately-owned media. It is important to allow free speech and expression. Privately owned media is crucial to quality of the media industry as positive outcome quality of the industry depends on freedom and autonomy to publish news and opinions, without bias. A significant part of the media is expected to remain private to allow independent opinion, and participation that put the government in balance. The media is the fourth estate and therefore should be allowed to function without any constraints.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 4: Statement 4 - There should be privately owned media outlets in order to allow freedom of expression, freedom of speech, and a diversity of opinions, which should be celebrated and promoted.
1: 3,2,4,1
1: 2,3,4,1
1: 3,2,1,4
1: 2,1,4,3
1: 2,4,1,3